Dell KACE integrated Remote Control Solution
Dell KACE likes to tout integration with Bomgar and other various remote support utilities making it more or less remote support agnostic. Integration is good and fine, but why not have a built in remote support option that allows an end user to request remote support immediately when they log a ticket? Many of the products in KACE competes with come with their own remote support solution that works with the same agent used for management. It would make sense that KACE have the same while allowing integration for those set on a specific product.
This has been completed by seamlessly integrating with a 3rd party partner
Martin Gruber commented
I have been told last year that a built-in solution, which goes over a browser session will be integrated. Now it is a 3rd-party solution where I need to setup an independent environment. It is free for 6 months but then you need to pay a lot. Not satisfied.
Kyle Black commented
Quest missed the mark on this request. Request was to have built-in remote control solution and not having to buy something else after 6 months
Jim Haynie commented
What 3rd party partner uses the KACE agent to have a remote support session?
Tim Glass commented
We just upgraded to version 9 and i don't see it. Will this be in version 10 and what is the planned release date for 10?
John Yanez commented
I agree this option would be beneficial. It would be good to see this remote support improvement to expand to Mac OS as well. KACE has the capability to inventory Macs already. It only makes sense that remote support would be supported on Mac's as well.
The primary reason I use the Kace appliance is for remote support of PCs. It seems natural to expect Kace to offer the client access and not have to be dependent on purchasing another software interface.
Darrell F commented
I agree, competitors include this ability for remote controlling Windows and Mac clients, with quick-access system tools. This would be a great addition and enhancement to the SMA.
Jim Haynie commented
Quest broke off the relationship with Bomgar and the integration is going away. We need a good solution that is well integrated.
Gerrit Zwart commented
This is really needed! It is crazy with all the other solutions on the market, that this is only available through external software programs without any special price. In my opinion this will definitely make Kace much more popular if it is build in!
Ben Peters commented
The best angle to sell them on Bomgar is that it's a going to save money over time. UVNC is difficult to deploy correctly and securely. Ensuring it runs over secure channel is one part of the battle, but you're still going to face inconsistencies between firewalls. The security concerns alone are enough to ditch VNC if you're subject to audits, and the SaaS solutions like Logmein can start showing up on your assessment reports.
After convincing management to go with Bomgar, I have gotten nothing but positive feedback on it as a tool, but I also have an even deeper appreciation for siding with on-premises device that is supported by the best of the best.
Remember shellshock? Patched in the middle of the day. Probably took a whole 5 minutes.
Joe Johnston commented
We like both solutions, but try selling the pricetag of Bomgar by itself to management. Even though know that it's high priced. But if the pricetag were rolled into the kbox purchase and licensing, then it's part of a whole solution that still comes in well under the competition.
I had talking about it with a Dell Professional and we found the idea very helpful and more simple to implement than the current solution (UVCN)