Enhance validation logic to allow 'and' and 'or'
Currently there is no easy way to mix "and's" and "ors", yet a typical validation logic for us is something like "if the computer is in room 1 or 2 or 3 and the file does not exist, then install"
If there was a way to nest the ands and or's or logically group them it would make life easier (currently we have to do either a rule for each room (i.e. if room1 and file does not exist, if room 2 and file does not exist, etc.) or we have to nest them (i.e. outer element is "if room 1 or 2 or 3) and inner element is "if feile does not exist)
Mark
shared this idea
Thanks to everyone who has weighed in on this idea. The R&D team is currently reviewing this idea and many more as we determine which set of features and enhancements we can deliver in the next product release. Stay tuned for more information and updates in this forum on this idea and many others. Feel free to continue to vote for this idea or add your input via additional comments if you have not yet done so. Keep all other ideas coming as well.
-
edv_ptk commented
Important feature!
Also wanted in two other posts:
https://www.quest.com/community/dams/i/ideas/enhance-validation-logic-to-allow-and-s-and-or-s