Andrew McNaughton

My feedback

  1. 33 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Appliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew McNaughton commented  · 

    This error is erroneous. lol.

    Basically, ignore it. The test here doesn't work for anonymous. The test that does work is under the Run diagnostic utilities.

    Ref: https://support.quest.com/kace-systems-management-appliance/kb/283691/setting-smtp-connection-as-anonymous

  2. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » Feature Enhancements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew McNaughton supported this idea  · 
    Andrew McNaughton shared this idea  · 
  3. 23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew McNaughton commented  · 

    This is resolved for the SMA but not the SDA v5.1. I have not been able to check SDA v6.0 yet.

    Andrew McNaughton supported this idea  · 
  4. 93 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Wake-on-LAN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew McNaughton supported this idea  · 
  5. 36 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Wake-on-LAN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew McNaughton commented  · 

    Allegedly, there was a security issue that forced Quest's hand with this one. I think it was rushed. The so-called advanced schedule is rudimentary. No custom option. No weekdays option. It also seems to have limitations because when I asked it to send magic packets to all of our Windows devices it didn't work. It works with labels with smaller numbers of devices. This means we need more schedules. Combine that with the missing weekdays option and we've multiplied the number of schedules we'll need to create by a factor of 10. It's an admin nightmare.

  6. 68 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  8 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » UX  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew McNaughton supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base