Michael

My feedback

  1. 263 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  9 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » New Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michael commented  · 

    Its really needed that the nightly sync is running multiple RSA sync in parallel. We are running 190 RSAs and it almost takes the whole day to just do the nightly sync without any changes. So Imagine how it looks like if we do changes, like adding a new Windows image. The appliance can easily do 20-25 sync jobs including transfering data to the RSAs when I trigger them manually (need to do it manually every time when we inject new driver for new models for example.) So why can´t this be setup and specified how many "concurrent" snycs my appliance is able to handle. We are running it on a datacentre cluster, so we can add resources as we need. So it should be configurable. The way it is right now is not usable for an enterprise environment, its just made for a small company having a handful remote sites.I do not always want to spend my weekend just because we need new drivers or a new windows version, just because a simple feature is missing.

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  2. 61 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  3. 63 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Ken Galvin responded

    Thank you for your input. This is under review and will be prioritized higher as more votes accumulate – so, we encourage you to vote if this interests you.

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  4. 129 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  5. 867 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  16 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Software Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael supported this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » New Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 
  7. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » New Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » New Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » Feature Enhancements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Michael shared this idea  · 
  10. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SDA (K2000) » New Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Alex Au Yeung responded

    We’re looking into extending the linking and integration abilities between a K1 and K2 and this would be one of the features we’d implement when that time comes.

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  11. 369 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    25 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » Feature Enhancements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re moving this request back to a planned state as there are some additional items that need to be worked out before we proceed with development of this potential feature.

    Microsoft has provided some additional requirements and processes that need to be completed, and this has added a timeline increase for feature release.

    We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and we will keep you informed when we have any significant progress updates.

    Michael supported this idea  · 
  12. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SDA (K2000) » Feature Enhancements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Dainelle Samuel responded

    We agree! This is great feature and the team is working diligently to get it into a future release. Stay tuned for more details.

    Michael supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base