Skip to content

Jeff

← Customer Feedback for Quest KACE

My feedback

4 results found

  1. undo archive assets

    15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) » Asset Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Jeff supported this idea  · 

  2. Allow document libraries managed by MDM. So a fleet of users have prescribed documentation.

    34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  KACE Cloud  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Jeff supported this idea  · 

  3. Save Column Visibility and transfer to other users

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) » General Feedback  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Jeff shared this idea  · 

  4. Better USMT Management (Scheduling, External Storage Ability, etc.)

    70 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  KACE Systems Deployment Appliance (SDA)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    under review  ·  John Karabaic responded

    We’d like to improve schedulling and automated tasks across the board on the K2000.

    I’m not as enthusiastic about supporting user state migration to non-K2000 storage. The advantage of the K2000 is that everything’s centralized. We already have export of user state in 3.3. If the problem is not having enough native storage on the K2000, we’ve heard that loud and clear.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff commented  · 

    I would like to see more granular control over options in the USMT scan template details.

    Jeff supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)