John

My feedback

  1. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John supported this idea  · 
    John commented  · 

    I would like this, also I could not successfully implement Matthew Shepard's code in the new 7.1

  2. 428 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John commented  · 

    I would still like this feature

  3. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Scripting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John commented  · 

    I agree with this comment one hundred percent, I have a list of Servers we do not want touched. We have it in the K1000 for informational purposes only. At the moment the label restrictions is for Device inventory and Resources, how ever if someone makes a mistake and selects a update to all devices. That will override our selection. Why even have a selection there if it is not authoritative. This concerns me greatly to where I might reduce the footprint of the K1000.

Feedback and Knowledge Base