bruce

My feedback

  1. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    bruce commented  · 

    Can't you do an approval required and allow the submitter to choose who they want as the approver today? Tha'ts just a field you enable, right?

  2. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  KACE GO  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    bruce shared this idea  · 
  3. 138 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Scripting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    bruce supported this idea  · 
  4. 269 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  29 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » New Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    bruce commented  · 

    It would be nice to be able to restrict the imaging of server hardware. That way, if someone tried to image a server, they would have to have seperate credentials to do so.

    Even further, be able to use the K1's smart labels or some other mechanism , maybe even just IP range, to restrict who has what access to imaging certain groups of machines.

    bruce supported this idea  · 
  5. 75 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Replication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Dean Wade responded

    We are looking into this. The reason it was eliminated was that it was trying to retrieve the information in real-time and the page never rendered where there many replication policies. Stay tuned – hoping to have an answer in the coming month as to where this falls in our priority list.

    bruce supported this idea  · 
  6. 106 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Asset Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    bruce supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base