Thank you. We will watch votes for this to judge interest so we may determine prioritization.
This is under consideration but not planned for the next release, Please continue voting if you’d like to see this feature prioritized for a future release.
We’d like to improve schedulling and automated tasks across the board on the K2000.
I’m not as enthusiastic about supporting user state migration to non-K2000 storage. The advantage of the K2000 is that everything’s centralized. We already have export of user state in 3.3. If the problem is not having enough native storage on the K2000, we’ve heard that loud and clear.