edv_ptk
My feedback
12 results found
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
16 votes
Thanks to everyone who has weighed in on this idea. The R&D team is currently reviewing this idea and many more as we determine which set of features and enhancements we can deliver in the next product release. Stay tuned for more information and updates in this forum on this idea and many others. Feel free to continue to vote for this idea or add your input via additional comments if you have not yet done so. Keep all other ideas coming as well.
edv_ptk supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment edv_ptk commented
These two things are frustrating us also in our daily work woth Desktop Authority. It's not a big thing for development, but a great simplification for users.
-
2 votes
edv_ptk shared this idea ·
-
3 votes
I hear you.
The R&D team is currently reviewing this idea and many more as we determine which set of features and enhancements we can deliver in the next product release. Stay tuned for more information and updates in this forum on this idea and many others. Feel free to continue to vote for this idea or add your input via additional comments if you have not yet done so. Keep all other ideas coming as well.edv_ptk supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Thanks to everyone who has weighed in on this idea. The R&D team is currently reviewing this idea and many more as we determine which set of features and enhancements we can deliver in the next product release. Stay tuned for more information and updates in this forum on this idea and many others. Feel free to continue to vote for this idea or add your input via additional comments if you have not yet done so. Keep all other ideas coming as well.
An error occurred while saving the comment edv_ptk commented
Important feature!
Also wanted in two other posts:
https://www.quest.com/community/dams/i/ideas/enhance-validation-logic-to-allow-and-s-and-or-sedv_ptk supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
edv_ptk supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
edv_ptk supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Thanks to everyone who has weighed in on this idea. The R&D team is currently reviewing this idea and many more as we determine which set of features and enhancements we can deliver in the next product release. Stay tuned for more information and updates in this forum on this idea and many others. Feel free to continue to vote for this idea or add your input via additional comments if you have not yet done so. Keep all other ideas coming as well.
An error occurred while saving the comment edv_ptk commented
Good idea. We could use it, too. Now we collect Tracefiles per script centrally, but there is no possibility to collect errors. Only when users notice problems.
edv_ptk supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Thanks to everyone who has weighed in on this idea. The R&D team is currently reviewing this idea and many more as we determine which set of features and enhancements we can deliver in the next product release. Stay tuned for more information and updates in this forum on this idea and many others. Feel free to continue to vote for this idea or add your input via additional comments if you have not yet done so. Keep all other ideas coming as well.
edv_ptk supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
Thanks to everyone who has weighed in on this idea. The R&D team is currently reviewing this idea and many more as we determine which set of features and enhancements we can deliver in the next product release. Stay tuned for more information and updates in this forum on this idea and many others. Feel free to continue to vote for this idea or add your input via additional comments if you have not yet done so. Keep all other ideas coming as well.
An error occurred while saving the comment edv_ptk commented
It's not only outdated, it is incomplete, too. Some variables or options can only be found in user forums. Maybe there are also more undocumented settings.
A list of all available variables would be very nice.edv_ptk supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Thanks to everyone who has weighed in on this idea. The R&D team is currently reviewing this idea and many more as we determine which set of features and enhancements we can deliver in the next product release. Stay tuned for more information and updates in this forum on this idea and many others. Feel free to continue to vote for this idea or add your input via additional comments if you have not yet done so. Keep all other ideas coming as well.
An error occurred while saving the comment edv_ptk commented
Concerning GPOs Office 2019 configuration is the same (also same templates) as Office 2016. Maybe you can treat it like this? We don't
-
12 votes
edv_ptk supported this idea ·
Nice idea, but file extension is too unsecure, because it's easy to manipulate.
File header would be the better choice.