John Parkinson

My feedback

  1. 78 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SMA (K1000) » Provisioning  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Parkinson supported this idea  · 
  2. 117 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  9 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Asset Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Parkinson commented  · 

    This is a very important aspect of asset management and most other solutions already include. I would love to see this implemented and soon.

    My help desk folks need to be able to make changes to assets statuses and who the asset is assigned to, etc... But those people do not EVER need to have the right to delete an asset from the database.

    John Parkinson supported this idea  · 
  3. 273 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Scripting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Dean Wade responded

    There are a couple of ways to approach this – I think the current thinking would be to add a “type” to each script and allow users to define them and then use the View By function. Thoughts?

    John Parkinson supported this idea  · 
  4. 124 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John Parkinson supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base