steve mal

My feedback

  1. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » Feature Enhancements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    steve mal shared this idea  · 
  2. 630 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    45 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Agent  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Ken Galvin responded

    Thank you for your input. Offering both 32 and 64 bit clients would double our Windows agent QA testing time and we are sensitive to the impact of extending test times as it impacts our ability to release full-featured updates at our desired pace. A surprisingly large amount of our customers still need 32bit support today. We are going to continue monitoring this closely to determine the best time to drop 32 bit support (of course older versions of the agent would still be available once we moved to 64 bit). In the meantime, it would be helpful to know specifically what difficulties a 32bit client is causing so we might consider work-arounds in parallel with the 64bit only decision.

    steve mal commented  · 

    It eliminates the needs to use crutches/work arounds to the 32 redirection caused by the client on 64 bit machines. ITninja's are constantly helping others to get around this gotcha the 32 bit client creates (ie sysnative and HKLM64). Most other Kace teams have gotten on the 64 bit wagon (especially the k2000 teams) and have introduced both 32 and 64 versions of the programs they offer so why can't the K1000 client team do the same. With the tools available today to compile software it is not as hard as it used to be to create both a 32 and 64 bit version.

    steve mal supported this idea  · 
  3. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Asset Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    steve mal supported this idea  · 
  4. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  www.ITNinja.com  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Michal Simek responded

    Like all suggestions here, if you’d like to see this, please vote it up to see it done sooner!

    steve mal supported this idea  · 
  5. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  SDA (K2000) » New Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    steve mal supported this idea  · 
  6. 77 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  4 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Software Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    steve mal supported this idea  · 
  7. 100 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Asset Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    steve mal supported this idea  · 
    steve mal commented  · 

    On windows boxes it picks this up from the "computer descrition" field under system properties - computer name tab which is this key in the the registry HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\lanmanServer\parameters /v srvcomment

Feedback and Knowledge Base