Anil Chohan

My feedback

  1. 69 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  SDA (K2000)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  John Karabaic responded

    We’d like to improve schedulling and automated tasks across the board on the K2000.

    I’m not as enthusiastic about supporting user state migration to non-K2000 storage. The advantage of the K2000 is that everything’s centralized. We already have export of user state in 3.3. If the problem is not having enough native storage on the K2000, we’ve heard that loud and clear.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anil Chohan commented  · 

    The main problem with the k2000 is USMT scanstates cannot be captured to replication sites. So for companies with multiple sites this feature is almost useless.

    Plus the fact that you cannot upload custom config.xml files to capture extra information. unless this has changed in k2000 v3.6?

    Anil Chohan supported this idea  · 
  2. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  SDA (K2000)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anil Chohan shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base