J. Bautista

My feedback

  1. 305 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    16 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » Feature Enhancements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’re moving this request back to a planned state as there are some additional items that need to be worked out before we proceed with development of this potential feature.

    Microsoft has provided some additional requirements and processes that need to be completed, and this has added a timeline increase for feature release.

    We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and we will keep you informed when we have any significant progress updates.

    J. Bautista supported this idea  · 
  2. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J. Bautista commented  · 
  3. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J. Bautista commented  · 
  4. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    J. Bautista shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Software Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    J. Bautista shared this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J. Bautista shared this idea  · 
  7. 415 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  11 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Agent  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J. Bautista commented  · 

    Agree. and similar to this: https://kace.uservoice.com/forums/82699-k1000/suggestions/3987437-allow-a-user-to-patch-on-demand

    Lots of complaints. So, my votes count as representative of 700+ users :)

    J. Bautista supported this idea  · 
  8. 928 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    23 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    J. Bautista supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J. Bautista commented  · 

    Agree. Also would add the end user needs a way to start patching if snoozed. We have 90% laptop and they only are in during business hours. That means patching during the day... yay! They can snooze for a couple of hours at a time but they can never start when they actually have time so it passes into the next day or another snooze. Lots of complaints. So, my votes count as representative of 700+ users :)

  9. 251 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  28 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » New Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    J. Bautista supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  10. 167 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This is under consideration but not planned for the next release. Please continue voting if you’d like to see this feature prioritized for a future release.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J. Bautista commented  · 

    I would also like to add the ability to change when the survey goes out and for which catagories of tickets to exclude. In other words, every 5th or 10th or xth ticket gets a survey. And when using processes and a catagory to match for that ticket queue, exclude the survey option for process tickets in that queue

    J. Bautista supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base