Matt T

My feedback

  1. 168 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » Feature Enhancements  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt T supported this idea  · 
  2. 272 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  30 comments  ·  SDA (K2000) » New Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt T supported this idea  · 
  3. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SMA (K1000) » Agent  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt T commented  · 

    This feature would be very useful us. Having controls around whether or not the catalog inventory runs, or what locations it scans when it runs seems essential for certain clients.

    We have several servers with large file shares, and when the catalog inventory runs, it causes performance issues on the disks since its also scanning the shares for any executables. For larger file shares, this process takes a long time and clients either get very large delays or time out issues.

    Matt T supported this idea  · 
  4. 62 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Agent  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  Ken Galvin responded

    We’re engouraging votes from those who feel strongly that this is a valuable feature

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt T commented  · 

    This feature would be very useful us. Having controls around whether or not the catalog inventory runs, or what locations it scans when it runs seems essential for certain clients.

    We have several servers with large file shares, and when the catalog inventory runs, it causes performance issues on the disks since its also scanning the shares for any executables. For larger file shares, this process takes a long time and clients either get very large delays or time out issues.

    Matt T supported this idea  · 
  5. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SMA (K1000) » Agent  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt T shared this idea  · 
  6. 422 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    22 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  Ken Galvin responded

    This feature request is under review. We encourage others to vote for it to be considered in a future release.

    Matt T supported this idea  · 
  7. 27 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Scripting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt T supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt T commented  · 

    This would be very useful. It makes sense from a access control point to restrict some technicians/admins from managing scripts, but instead just running them. But having that run on all devices button so easily mistakenly picked scares me. I think having the ability to at the minimum remove it, but if possible be controlled by roles, that would fix the issue.

Feedback and Knowledge Base