Donny Nicol

My feedback

  1. 370 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    22 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » UX  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Dean Wade responded

    Over the coming releases, we will be revamping our targeting and scheduling pages. This a great example of where we will extend your ability to control what you are targeting and when it should be delivered.

    Donny Nicol commented  · 

    Has any progress been made in adding the option to exclude based on a label or individual device? I find it inefficient, cumbersome and prone to errors creating multiple "Smart" labels which are dependent on other label names (since there are no GUIDs for labels).

    https://kace.uservoice.com/forums/82699-sma-k1000/suggestions/15776917-label-ids-for-smart-label-criteria

    Donny Nicol supported this idea  · 
  2. 821 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Donny Nicol supported this idea  · 
  3. 32 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Managed Install  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Donny Nicol supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SMA (K1000) » Appliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Donny Nicol commented  · 

    I have also run into this issue whereby a simple name change of a label breaks a dependent smart label, which could lead to mass patching of devices which need a more controlled patching routine. If there was a way to choose the existing labels, perhaps from a drop down list, or if this is not feasible then at least a unique identifier which can be easily referenced without having to resort to complex queries which would be unsupported by standard Quest support.

    Donny Nicol supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base