William Mullen
My feedback
-
89 votesWilliam Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
163 votes
Thank you for your very thorough desciption of the issue. We will consider this as a feature request in the future. We prioritize based on feedback like yours – so we encourage others to vote for this feature request.
William Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
87 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment William Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
This feature request has been included in our development plan for an upcoming release.
William Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
90 votesunder review · 4 comments · SMA (K1000) » Software Compliance · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →William Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteWilliam Mullen
shared this idea
·
-
42 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment William Mullen
commented
Still waiting on this???
-
298 votes
We’re moving this request back to a planned state as there are some additional items that need to be worked out before we proceed with development of this potential feature.
Microsoft has provided some additional requirements and processes that need to be completed, and this has added a timeline increase for feature release.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, and we will keep you informed when we have any significant progress updates.
William Mullen
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment William Mullen
commented
Yes, we recently (believe it or not) switched from Legacy to UEFI to minimise tech interaction during the imaging process. How wonderful was it to find out we STILL need to touch the BIOS to disable Secure Boot to boot with UEFI!
-
139 votes
We have some new features planned that include parts of this suggestion. Stay tuned!
William Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesWilliam Mullen
supported this idea
·
William Mullen
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesunder review · 0 comments · SMA (K1000) » Software Compliance · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →William Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesWilliam Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesWilliam Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
37 votes
Thank you for your input. We are investigating this and encourage others to vote for this feature/functionality if they think it would be useful
William Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
158 votesWilliam Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteWilliam Mullen
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment William Mullen
commented
Should be able to approach something close to what you want to do with cron, i.e., cron 0 9 15-21 */2 5
-
302 votes
This feature request is under review. We encourage others to vote for it to be considered in a future release.
William Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
710 votesunder review · 14 comments · SMA (K1000) » Software Compliance · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →William Mullen
supported this idea
·
-
918 votes
Deploy on demand for Windows is planned for the next major release
William Mullen
supported this idea
·
Can we get an update on this? It's really inconceivable that I can't use the RSA devices I already have at each location as a replication share... instead I need a whole OTHER system to do it. How hard would it be to integrate a "pseudo-agent" and SMB share on the RSA just so that we can see it in the replication share drop-down?