James Gray

My feedback

  1. 51 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Gray commented  · 

    I concur. I would like to be able to track non-IT assets and give non-IT personnel access to those assets and be able to separate this by asset type. For instance, fleet assets are managed by the fleet manager, uniform and accessory assets are managed by the quartermaster. Each asset type should not be able to be managed/accessed by the other roles.

    James Gray supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    James Gray supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Gray commented  · 

    I am currently able to do this via a custom Ticket Rule. However, it would be nice if this was a built-in feature because there was a database schema change that happened during one of the Kace SMA updates that broke my rule. I was able to fix it, but it would be really great if this could be a standard feature. My query uses a user label that represents a subset of users from the queue owner group. When a ticket is created that does not match any of the other auto assignment rules that are based on ticket category, it grabs the "next up" technician and assigns the ticket to that person.

  3. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    James Gray supported this idea  · 
  4. 28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » OVAL  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    James Gray commented  · 

    We are starting to use Kace as an OVAL scanner and including the severity level would be very beneficial in ranking the priority for handling the vulnerabilities.

    James Gray supported this idea  · 
  5. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    James Gray shared this idea  · 
  6. 37 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Agent  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  Ken Galvin responded

    Thank you for your input. We are investigating this and encourage others to vote for this feature/functionality if they think it would be useful

    James Gray supported this idea  · 
  7. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Asset Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    James Gray shared this idea  · 
  8. 905 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  16 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Software Compliance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    James Gray supported this idea  · 
  9. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SMA (K1000) » Service Desk  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    James Gray supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base