Nicolas

My feedback

  1. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Asset Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicolas shared this idea  · 
  2. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicolas commented  · 

    It seems that SCCM has the same issue:
    https://configurationmanager.uservoice.com/forums/300492-ideas/suggestions/14810217-configmgr-sum-installs-should-update-the-date-of-l
    The date can be changed through this reg value: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\WindowsUpdate\Auto Update\Results
    Ideally, this variable could be adjusted after patching detection and after patching deployment.

    Nicolas shared this idea  · 
  3. 743 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    42 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    This feature was initially slated to fit within the 9.1 release; however, due to development efforts, it needed to be deferred until a later release (with that most likely being 10.0).

    I believe Ken had inadvertently marked this as Complete by mistake, and we apologize for the confusion.

    Nicolas supported this idea  · 
  4. 384 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicolas supported this idea  · 
  5. 351 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  7 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Agent  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicolas supported this idea  · 
    Nicolas commented  · 

    Hello.
    This uservoice: https://kace.uservoice.com/forums/82699-k1000/suggestions/1883957-progress-bar-when-deploying-patches is flagged as "Completed" but this is not the case.

  6. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Provisioning  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Ken Galvin responded

    Thank you for your suggestion. This has been added to the feature request list. We encourage others to vote as we use this input for prioritizing our release plans.

    Nicolas shared this idea  · 
  7. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicolas supported this idea  · 
    Nicolas commented  · 

    Hello.

    I agree with Radius Authentication as Charles Kruger said. This has been asked here:
    http://kace.uservoice.com/forums/82699-k1000/suggestions/6757649-multi-factor-authentication
    It can also apply for all other Kace products.

  8. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SMA (K1000) » Patch Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Nicolas shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base