Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

7 results found

  1. 365 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    This is under consideration but not planned for the next release, Please continue voting if you’d like to see this feature prioritized for a future release.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 161 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Really disappointed that this suggestion is nearing 4 years of age without even being Under Review or Planned. This is by far my biggest pet peeve of image maintenance in the K2000. Instead of 1 thick client image and 1 thin client image and being able to use tasks for the rest, I have to have a total of 12:

    Site 1 ThickClient Org A
    Site 1 ThickClient Org B
    Site 1 ThinClient
    Site 1 ThinClient Mobile
    Site 2 ThickClient Org A
    Site 2 ThickClient Org B
    Site 2 ThinClient
    Site 2 ThinClient Mobile
    Site 3 ThickClient Org A
    Site 3 ThickClient Org B
    Site 3 ThinClient
    Site 3 ThinClient Mobile

    This is silly.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 63 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 81 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 58 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  Ken Galvin responded

    Thank you for your suggestion. I have put this in our product feature backlog. Please vote for this feature if you are interested so we can move it up the priority list. If a workaround is discovered, it will be posted here.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base